large_ok-loft-hero-bg.jpg

medium_ok-loft-hero-bg.jpg

small_ok-loft-hero-bg.jpg

thumbnail_ok-loft-hero-bg.jpg

ok-loft-hero-bg.jpg

category-articles.jpeg

Press Releases

img.svg

State Finances

### Executive Summary

#### Key Questions
- In recent years, how have certified revenues differed from actual revenues?
- How does Oklahoma declare budget shortfalls, and how can the state better plan for financial challenges?
- What is the process leading up to the presentation of revenue figures to the BOE?
- What opportunities exist to better inform policymakers of revenue trends and economic conditions?

The primary role of the Oklahoma Legislature is to enact laws, and a required function within that role is to appropriate funds to state programs and services. Each year, the Legislature develops a budget, which is submitted to the Governor for approval.

As a mechanism contributing to meeting the State’s balanced budget requirement, the funds certified by the State’s Board of Equalization (BOE) are subject to an appropriation limit up to 95 percent of their total estimate. However, in recent years, economic events have resulted in dramatic fluctuations in this figure and added uncertainty to the [budgeting process](https://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=85067), mainly due to the volatility of gross production and corporate income taxes.

Through this limited scope evaluation, the Legislative Office of Fiscal Transparency (LOFT) sought to provide clarification to the Legislative Oversight Committee about the accuracy, communication, and revenue certification processes of the BOE. LOFT analyzed the accuracy of the revenue estimates, assessed the State’s strength to respond to economic fluctuations impacting accuracy, examined steps leading to determining those estimates, and finally, identified opportunities for policy changes to elevate efficiency and transparency.

This report examines current policies and practices related to determining the State’s budget, their outcomes, and identifies process improvements, including expanding the information provided to the BOE, engaging the Legislature in the creation of estimates, enabling both the Executive and the Legislative branches to work from the same estimates, folding the State’s budget management into the revenue management process, and adjusting the apportionment of taxes according to the State’s priorities.

#### Key Statistics
- By FY09-20, revenue projections were overestimated an average of 2.3%; however, GRF projections without GPT were underestimated by 1.4% on average.
- Out of eight years that GPT was overestimated, GRF estimates without GPT were exceeded by actuals half of the time.
- GPT actuals are $0.89 for every $1.00 estimated.
- The combined balance of the Constitutional Reserve Fund (Rainy Day Fund) and Energy Stabilization Fund is 3.4% ($230M) of GRF FY21 June estimate.

#### Finding 1: The revenue estimation process results in inefficiency of agency resources and time, and insufficient communication of actions and data.
Due to statutory constraints, the deadline for the Governor's Executive Budget is poorly timed when compared to the release of BOE estimates and legislative deadlines. The constitutional constraints of BOE’s revenue certification meetings and lack of alignment between the Executive and the Legislature leads to a budget process that begins in conflict.

Additionally, lack of policy guidelines leaves the revenue estimation process, particularly the special revenue failure certification and advisory meetings, subject to interpretation regarding deliverables.

Statutory separation of the revenue estimation processes and failure management between the Office of Management and Enterprise Services (OMES) and the Oklahoma Tax Commission (OTC) further contributes to inefficiencies in timely delivery of crucial information to the Legislature. Last, after the February revenue estimates are certified, the process does not allow flexibility to adapt to changing conditions.

**Policy Considerations**
- Ensure the Oklahoma Tax Commissioners are involved and informed about the preparation of budget estimates by enacting a statutory requirement. Although internal policies are currently in place, a statutory requirement would assure consistent policies across administrations
- Align the certification of estimates with the Governor’s Executive Budget to ensure that the Executive and Legislative Branches are building budgets from the same figures
- Codify current policies of the Oklahoma Tax Commission for frequent reporting of revenue trends that may impact state budgeting
- Allow for adjustments to estimates in the event of a revenue failure
- Expand data provided to all stakeholders involved in developing the budget to include the logic and methodology used in the selection of gross estimates, as well as all estimates considered
- Enhance the transparency and communication about state revenues by involving the Legislature in the revenue forecasting process, and/or combining the budgeting office (OMES) with the taxation and revenues office (OTC)

#### Finding 2: Volatility of revenue sources negatively impacts budget estimate accuracy.
Gross Production Tax (GPT) is the largest of the two volatile revenue sources Oklahoma uses to build its budget. As shown in Key Statistics (page 5), the volatile nature of GPT hinders Oklahoma’s ability to accurately forecast this revenue source on a consistent basis, even in strong U.S. and Oklahoma economic conditions. As such, the volatility impacts the State’s ability to build stable budgets, while additionally impacting the State’s ability to invest into stabilization funds intended to dampen the effects of the volatility of revenue sources and economic uncertainty.

**Policy Considerations**
Review reserve funds to identify opportunities to better prepare for the volatility of Oklahoma’s Gross Production Revenues

#### Finding 3: Shifting tax dynamics highlight need for more inclusive estimation process.
GPT and Corporate Income Tax represent an increasing share of the State’s general revenues. Despite the importance of these inflows, the Board of Equalization membership or internal process does not currently include experts in these fields. This leads to estimation inaccuracy; Oklahoma has overestimated revenue in 7 of the last 12 years. Utilizing a more consensus- driven model, a noted best practice, can improve estimation accuracy.

**Policy Considerations**
Enhance or change the composition of the BOE to include representation from Oklahoma’s leading economic sectors, including experts from volatile revenue streams

Executive Summary

State Board of Equalization

Report

Report & Resources

The Legislature may consider the following policy changes:

#### Finding 1: The revenue estimation process results in inefficiency of agency resources and time, and insufficient communication of actions and data.

**Enable** the Governor and the Legislature to work from the same and final BOE estimates.
- 62 O.S. § 34.37 - adjust by removing the word “immediately”; this would enable the Executive Budget to be submitted based on the February BOE certification, and make sure both branches utilize the same estimates for budget planning.

**Consolidate** OMES budget planning operations with the Oklahoma Tax Commission to achieve vertical integration through efficiencies of time, effort, and information.
- 62 O.S. § 34.49 and 68 O.S. § 102.3 - merging statutes would allow for moving the state’s budget functions to OTC, which already is responsible for reporting revenue declines
- 68 O.S. § 102.3 - change to provide OTC with greater flexibility in reporting revenue declines
- 62 O.S. § 34.2 - change to make sure that BOE packets are inclusive of all economic outlook data, gross OTC estimates, and that packets are distributed sooner to its designated recipients

**Facilitate** sharing of information about estimates with the Legislature.
- 68 O.S. § 118:
   - Facilitate making the BOE packet available to BOE members and the Legislature within 48 hours of the regular and special (advisory) meetings
   - Change existing statutory requirement that makes information available “upon request” to language that requires BOE estimates to be accompanied with a list of all estimates considered, justification for selections made, and the economic outlooks received from consultants

**Empower** the OTC Commissioners.
- 68 O.S. § 102.3 - add a requirement that gross revenue estimates provided to OMES for regular and special BOE meetings must be approved by the Commission, and define the timing of such Commission approval meetings before BOE meetings

**Codify** processes leading to the declaration of a revenue failure.
- 62 O.S. § 34.2 - create new policy to identify responsibilities for preparing packets for special BOE meetings according to O.C. Article X, § 23,6-8
- O.C. Article X, Section 23 - modify to enable adjustment of the February estimates in the event of a revenue gap

**Create** policies providing communication parameters.
- 62 O.S. § 34.2 - create new policy to establish when OTC is required to provide estimates to OMES
- 62 O.S. § 34.2 - create new policy under to direct when OMES is required to provide packets before the regular and special BOE meetings
- O.C. Article X, Section 23 - modify to align BOE’s December and February meeting dates with agencies’ budgeting deadlines and provide state leadership with the ability to maximize outcomes of state programs

#### Finding 2: Volatility in revenue sources negatively impacts estimate accuracy.
**Reduce** reliance on the GPT in a present budget cycle to focus on long-term stability.
- 68 O.S. § 1004 - review the apportionment for gross production revenue
- 62 O.S. § 34.103 – lift the cap on total deposits possible to the Stabilization Fund
- O.C. Article X, § 23.5:
   - increase or remove maximum balance limit, and / or,
   - change the reference form the balance to yearly deposit, and/or,
   - change the reference from the preceding fiscal year to current.
   - build a constitutionally protected trust fund, the proceeds of which appropriations would be made with limited impact of economy fluctuations; (see Appendix F. Volatility of the Gross Production, page 49)

#### Finding 3: Shifting tax dynamics highlight need for more inclusive estimation process.
**Change** the composition of BOE. 
- O.C. Article X, Section 21
   - expand the composition of the BOE with the Legislature appointing experts in the volatile revenue sources, or
   - replace BOE with body consisting of members appointed by the Executive and Legislative branch and inclusive of the volatile industry experts


Recommendations

Impact Evaluation

January 2021

Evaluations In Progress

Health and Human Services

Agency Investigation: Financial Condition of the Oklahoma Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuses Services
Expected Date Published: March 2025

Financial Condition of the Oklahoma Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services

General Government 

Report: 24-000-01
Identify all reports statutorily required to be provided to the Legislature. 

Agency Reports

Report: 24-296-01
Conduct an operational assessment of the Ethics Commission.


Operational Assessment of the Oklahoma Ethics Commission

State Board of Equalization

More Reports & Evaluations

Financial Condition of the Oklahoma Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services

Agency Reports

Operational Assessment of the Oklahoma Ethics Commission